InventiumInventiumInventiumInventium
Menu
  • Services
      • For Individuals
      • For Teams
      • For Organisations
      • For Events
      • For Schools
    • Close
  • Services
      • For Individuals
      • For Teams
      • For Organisations
      • For Events
      • For Schools
    • Close
  • Our Story
      • About Us
      • The Team
      • Careers
    • Close
  • Our Story
      • About Us
      • The Team
      • Careers
    • Close
  • Case Studies
  • Case Studies
  • Resources
      • Blogs
      • Media
      • Books
    • Close
  • Resources
      • Blogs
      • Media
      • Books
    • Close
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Us

If it’s good enough for the Wright brothers

By The Inventium Team | Imogen Aitken | 0 comment | 5 May, 2017 |

In 1903, Orville Wright, with his brother Wilbur watching from below, piloted history’s first ever powered, manned flight. That singular flight completely changed the course of history. There are now over 100,000 commercial flights in the air each day…(in fact I am writing from one now!). But the Wright Brothers weren’t only remarkable in having achieved that feat, they were also remarkable in the way they experimented to get there.

You see there were other players in the world of flight research in the late 19th century, most of whom used one of two methods when experimenting. Some used small scale models as the basis of their research, while others went the whole hog and conducted their experiments using full-sized, powered aircraft.

Funnily enough, both of these approaches were risky. It turns out that experimenting with small scale models is great…at teaching you about small scale models – leaving a very big jump to human flight. Experimenting with full-sized, powered aircraft yields more relevant results – but is dangerous, resource intensive and slow moving (not to mention the cost involved in travelling such a short distance, both in distance and in learning).

The Wright Bros. took a third approach in conducting their experiments. They believed in following a gradual, incremental and evolutionary path to flight. They began with kites and un-manned gliders, before progressing onto piloted gliders, and eventually to designing an engine. In following this methodology they were able to de-risk their experiments, using each one to learn only what they needed to prove or disprove a hypothesis, before making changes based on their results, and moving onto the next!

In doing so they actually progressed more quickly than their peers, without costly failure. In essence, they were able to fail early and often. If a glider crashed, it didn’t matter – it taught them enough to make it worth it.

As innovators we can learn a lot from Wilbur and Orville – particularly about how to fail well. We too, want our failures to be lean and rich with learning. We don’t want our failures to be the equivalent of a full-sized powered aircraft crash, but rather our workplace’s equivalent of a glider.

In order to achieve this we have to use a scientific methodology:

  1. Set hypotheses – what are the things you assume to be true about your idea and why it will be successful?
  2. Design and build an experiment to test your riskiest hypotheses
  3. Analyse the results of your experiment to assess whether your hypotheses are proven or disproven
  4. Make small, iterative changes to your idea based on your learnings to maximise your chance of success
    If you would like to learn more about HOW to experiment with the best of them, come along to our Experimentation Masterclass in May!

If you would like to geek out with me about the power of the scientific process in the workplace then contact me here: imogen@inventium.com.au and for some interesting reading about experimentation check-out this HBR article, and this blog post by my fellow-Inventiologist, Judy.

experimentation, failure, hypotheses, Minimum Viable Products

The Inventium Team

More posts by The Inventium Team

Related Post

  • Ready, fire, aim: Lean Startup in the virtual world 

    By The Inventium Team | 0 comment

    Christine here. Nice to e-meet you all! While I’m an Innovation Consultant in Melbourne, spreading the Lean Startup message (amongst other methodologies), my brother Cameron, is living Lean Startup in his Seattle-based games company, AgainstRead more

  • How to identify an MVP, and rapidly test your brilliant idea

    By The Inventium Team | 0 comment

    ‘I’ve seriously just come up with the next golden egg. It’s going to be as popular as Facebook and as disruptive as Uber.’ Have you heard a friend say this before? Or maybe you’ve hadRead more

  • Innovation Culture Australia

    Three signs that your organisation is killing innovation

    By The Inventium Team | 0 comment

    Innovation is a word at the tip of almost every CEO’s lips. However, despite the best of intentions, many organisations are killing innovation. There are several issues that these organisations have in common.   LeadersRead more

  • Inventium, Inventium Blog, Stephanie Thoo, Amantha Imber, Dr Amantha Imber,

    The difference between good risk-taking and carelessness

    By The Inventium Team | 0 comment

    In many organisations the ‘F’ word, failure, is not tolerated. But failure is an inevitable part of innovation, as it comes naturally to anything with an element of uncertainty to it. The idea of risk-takingRead more

  • Start By Being Stupid

    By The Inventium Team | 0 comment

    Creative managers know that if you approach a challenge knowing nothing, you’re likely to come up with a solution that is different and original. Most of us are brought up to believe that failure shouldRead more

Recent Posts

  • 14 Days of Innovation
  • In Defence of the Irrational
  • Assume nothing: How To Boost Your Innovation Success
  • Do your employees have a voice? If not, your innovation is at risk
  • Why giving people choice is the secret ingredient to changing behaviour

Blog Tags

assumptions (4) blame (3) brainstorming (4) capability building (8) challenge (4) collaboration (3) creative thinking (25) creativity (109) Customer Driven Innovation (4) customers (16) decision-making (11) disruptive innovation (15) divergent thinking (3) diverse stimulus (5) experimentation (15) facilitation (4) failure (13) groupthink (3) growth (5) idea generation (23) idea selling (4) importance of innovation (4) incremental innovation (5) innovation culture (10) innovation definition (5) innovation framework (3) innovation management (4) innovation process (5) innovation strategy (8) innovation supergroup (3) innovation workshop (8) leadership (12) learning orientation (7) market research (7) Minimum Viable Products (7) most innovative companies (9) motivation (4) natural environment (5) problem solving (7) productivity (5) prototype (3) recognition (5) stress (3) The Lean Startup (12) unconscious mind (4)
Inventium

Join over 17,000 other curious folk who like to receive
free scientifically proven innovation tips


Phone: +61 3 9018 7455
Email: hello@inventium.com.au
Talk Innovation With Us Today →

Website Made With ❤ By Start Digital